"Children are, for the most part, perfectly decent people but even the very best of them are really terrible critics. Nonetheless, we have begun to look to them for cultural recommendations. This past decade, they have given us Twilight and Harry Potter when, really, they should have kept that bunk for themselves. While it is true that some of their better Pixar films have made this imposition easier to brook, it is also true that older children gave us Divergent and The Fault in our Stars and made it perfectly acceptable for adult humans to speak, with delusional force, about the richness of Dr Who.
Dr Who is a reasonable thing but it is not a Complex Text. Of course, children cannot really be blamed for our grown-up intoxication by their lolly-water. We have no one to charge but ourselves for the embrace not only of items intended for consumption by children but for our demand for childish techniques in ‘adult’ entertainment."
The article (very strongly) states that no-one over the age of 17 should be reading YA fiction for the reason that it;s juvenile and because children aren't very good critics. It argues that even works such as Game of Thrones (which is very graphic and violent indeed) are even too juvenile for works that are actually meaningful and important. This article however, is not as lenient as Ruth Graham's and rather forces things down your throat, saying you cannot read whatever you want.
Razer, Helen. “Attention Young Adult Fiction Fans: Grow Up.” Daily Review, dailyreview.com.au/attention-young-adult-fiction-fans-grow-up/12911/.
DeRosa, Vivian Parkin. “I'm A Teenager And I Don't Like Young Adult Novels. Here's Why.” HuffPost, HuffPost, 21 June 2017, www.google.ca/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_594a8e4de4b062254f3a5a94/amp.
This article tells of someone who is in the target demographic for YA novels and provides reasonable explanations for why they dislike them. It does not force feed anything and is entirely opinion based, and has supportive evidence to back it up.
This episode of A Matter of Opinion will focus on ageism, more specifically ageism in relation to literature. Articles such as Ruth Graham’s, who quotes that “Adults should be embarrassed to read YA fiction” and to the Daily Review’s article which claims “Adults reading YA fiction: Grow up.”
These articles affect nearly everybody who finds reading enjoyable, seeing as everybody grows up and that everybody will at some point reach the “age limit.” These articles don’t say you can’t read whatever you want, but they do say that it is frowned upon because YA fiction cannot tackle such heavy and complex topics that adult fiction does. They always end happily, and always follow a cheesy, repetitive plotline. However, many believe that it should not matter, because YA provides a nostalgic escape from heavy topics that adult fiction tackles.
The argument in the episode will be against these articles, however it will also offer some support in favour of what they say. The episode features some articles that argue against it and will also feature a brief interview with award-winning author of The Break, Katherena Vernette.
The argument of the episode will be that you should be able to read whatever you want, and that there is no reason to be embarrassed about what you read, because reading, (especially in the digital age) is slowly becoming a lost form of entertainment. There is also no reason why YA should not be able to make its readers think critically. For example, in The Hobbit, the premise is to travel across the land and reclaim the kingdom of the dwarves, and by the end, the king of said kingdom passes away, leaving all the effort for nothing. This is sometimes a real-life concept, and is still able to provide the outlook on life (I.e. that sometimes, no matter how hard you try, you do not succeed). As such, this is proof that YA novels can still offer deep, insightful lesson about life just the same as Adult fiction can. There is also the fact that any literature is still literature, and is constructive to your reading ability in any case, no matter the age range. There is also the fact that although authors may want an age range, they do not confine the age range to just that. They also want everyone else to enjoy it as well, not just that specific target audience.
On the other hand, the target demographic may be for children, and so someone may smirk or laugh upon seeing you reading The Fault in Our Stars in public should you have it with you. So perhaps embarrassment is a natural emotion because being caught with one of these may indicate you have a below-average reading ability or perhaps that you are far too naïve.
This is important because it points to ageism as a whole. Adults are frowned upon for liking Star Wars on occasion, for example. Ageism is an extremely patronizing concept. Remember how you felt as a kid when your relatives would tell you, “you can’t sit at the adults table, you’re too young.” Though there may have been good reason, it still felt like you were being talked down to. Everyone wants to be treated as equals, not as older or younger.
The episode will also briefly explore the concept of ageism in a broader sense.